Saturday, January 18, 2020

Biden hints: I will take the Fifth

Front-running Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden has implied that, if called to testify at President Trump's impeachment trial, he will avail himself of his Fifth Amendment right not to take the witness stand.

As an experienced lawyer and former head of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Biden would have known the implication of his contradictory remarks reported Dec. 28.

Biden said that he would refuse to testify at the trial, but later issued a statement that he has always complied with lawful subpoenas. So either he intends to say that a subpoena from the Senate, where he served as a Delaware lawmaker for many years, is somehow technically flawed or he plans to show up but to say nothing -- which is his right under the Fifth Amendment if he believes he could face prosecution for his Ukraine activities.

Thursday, January 16, 2020

Turncoat GOP cabal maneuvers to tar Trump

At least four Republican senators are playing a cagey game on the calling of witnesses for the impeachment trial of President Trump. There doesn't seem to be much reason for this cageyness other than to steer the trial in such a way as to justify their joining Democrats for a majority vote for removal. Trump still is unlikely to be removed, since that would require 67 votes. But a majority in favor of removal could severely hamper his re-election chances. 

The numbers show that it will be a close-run operation as to whether the Deep Swamp is able to achieve a Senate vote of censure, which could be enough to weaken the hand of federal prosecutor John Durham as he conducts a criminal investigation of the secret political police (AKA the "intelligence community").

Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska hasn't been very clever about disguising her pro-abortion, anti-Trump animus. She made clear that she was eager to hear from Trump's former national security adviser, John Bolton, who is thought by Democrats to have damaging information against Trump, but she is extremely reticent on whether she would like to hear from witnesses called by the Trump team, in particular Joe Biden and his son Hunter. That is, her public priorities are no different from those of the Democrats.

Sen. Susan Collins of Maine says her position on the calling of witnesses has been "mischaracterized," but she also won't grant that the President should be allowed to call witnesses. She is campaigning for a fifth term for a seat expected to be strongly challenged by a Democrat.

Sen. Mitch Romney of Utah  has said explicitly that he wants  Bolton to appear. Romney has issued a scathing denunciation of Trump's mocking call for China to investigate Joe Biden and his son Hunter with respect to special financial favors from a government-controlled business.

Sen. Cory Gardner of Colorado has declined to say whether he is one of a group of GOP senators who could vote with Democrats to obtain witnesses wanted by the Democrats.

Another unknown quantity is Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee. Despite his being counted as a member of the turncoat cabal, from his most recent statement it is not certain that he will tilt the table in favor of the Democrats. Alexander however cannot be counted on to vote with the Democrats. Alexander said he is open to seeking additional information and having witnesses testify, if necessary, during the Senate trial.

With the trial expected to begin Thursday, the three-term senator also said he opposes immediate dismissal by the GOP-controlled Senate of the articles of impeachment.

"I think we should hear the case," Alexander said Wednesday. "We have a constitutional duty to do that."

Alexander said that "number one," the arguments should be heard. "Number two," senators should ask questions and "number three," senators should be able to  vote on whether additional evidence should be sought.

"Evidence could be witnesses," declared Alexander, who is retiring at the end of this third term. "It could be documents."

Without naming names, Sen. Rand Paul, a Kentucky Republican, blistered the turncoat GOP cabal whose memmbers would, he suspected, grant the Democrats their witnesses but not Trump or other Republicans theirs.

The cabal is crucial to the Deep Swamp's push to get Trump "six ways to Sunday" as Durham closes in on security officials who abused power in order to carry out espionage against the Trump campaign and the Trump presidency.

Wednesday, January 15, 2020

Pelosi's wild circus
Impeachment prosecutor faces grilling as witness

Adam Schiff, D-Cal., is one of the impeachment managers who will present the Democrats' case to the Senate. He also faces the prospect of being called to testify about his or his staff's contacts with the CIA's so-called whistleblower.

Because Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., has been pressuring the majority to call witnesses the Democrats favor for bolstering their case, the GOP says it may wish  to hear from other witnesses, including Schiff, the "anonymous" (not really) CIA officer, and Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden, along with his well-remunerated son Biden.

Democrats "want all the witnesses that they want," said Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. "They don't want any witnesses that the President wants. So I say this, either allow all witnesses, all witnesses that the President's defense team deems necessary to their defense, or no witnesses," Paul said in a Fox News interview.

"We're not going to do a kangaroo court like they did in the House," he said, adding that the House only produced witnesses that House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff agreed to.

It is certain that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, R-Cal., knew that she was creating a very serious potential conflict of interest by naming Schiff as a manager, implying that she is hoping to create more controversy, no doubt in hopes that the more controversy, the better, as she is well aware that the case has virtually no chance of doing anything but arousing Republican wrath.

Monday, January 13, 2020

The GOP has not declined to call witnesses

The point of contention is whether they will need to be called for the impeachment trial once the Democrats present their case. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., has said that the Senate will decide on whether any witnesses are necessary once the Democratic prosecution is complete.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Cal., is saying that if Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., doesn't get to call witnesses, that result would be a coverup.

But neither Pelosi nor Schumer seem awfully enthusiastic about calling the CIA "whistleblower" or Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son Hunter as trial witnesses.

So though -- possibly -- testimony from John Bolton, Trump's former national security adviser, would hurt Trump, a number of witnesses summoned by Republicans are very likely to stir up bad PR for Democrats.

In other words, it seems likely that Pelosi is hoping no witnesses are called so that she can use the word "coverup" while Democrats are spared the harsh light of Senate exposes. But there is no doubt that a number of GOP senators would be happy to pay back House Democrats for their impeachment theater of the absurd, and that would mean summoning witnesses that put the Democrats to shame, though this might be handled, once the trial is over, during regular oversight hearings.

Sunday, January 12, 2020

McConnell backs rule change
to force impeachment action

The Senate majority leader is adding his crucial support to a resolution to change the Senate’s rules to permit lawmakers to dismiss articles of impeachment against President Trump before the House sends them over, the Hill reports.

The GOP leader, Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., has signed on as a co-sponsor to the resolution, according to Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., who introduced the resolution last week.

Changing the rules would either require a two-thirds vote or for Republicans to deploy the "nuclear option," the Hill observed. As the GOP does not control two-thirds of the Senate, the "nuclear option" for the use of a simple majority would be required. Whether McConnell is seriously considering this possibility is not clear, as further action will be unnecessary if House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Cal., sends the articles over this week, as she has indicated she would.

The resolution would give the House 25 days to send articles of impeachment over to the Senate. After that, a senator could offer a motion to dismiss "with prejudice for failure by the House of Representatives to prosecute such articles" with a simple majority vote, according to Hawley's proposal.

McConnell has said he has been consulting closely with the White House on the impeachment case, which might imply that the President's legal team has assented to Hawley's maneuver.

McConnell has repeatedly assailed Pelosi for her delay in sending over the two articles of impeachment.

"This is what they have done: They have initiated one of the most grave and most unsettling processes in our Constitution and then refused to allow a resolution," he said Thursday. ‘The Speaker began something that she herself predicted would be 'so divisive to the country' ... and now she is unilaterally saying it cannot move forward towards a resolution."

Ax is poised at FISA court,
an angry Nunes declares

See his blast on Fox News.

Friday, January 10, 2020


Pssst...'Fair trial' refers
to what is due the defendant

not what is due the prosecution
Image result for trump
The defendant: President Trump
Image result for adam schiff Image result for nadler Image result for pelosi
The chief accusers (from top left): Adam Schiff, Jerrold Nadler and Nancy Pelosi

NEWS of the WORLD launched

The Invisible Man is being folded into the new site, NEWS of the WORLD, which has begun operation. Though this Invisible Man site is ce...